……. coming
INTRO sort of
This is all unbelievable. If the AI is , as his masters of algorithm claim, becoming a contextual wizard, hm, it will all end in tears.
Or on the other hand, in Ai switching himself off.
What is officially a meaning of context, given by the vocabulary or by the same AI:
Context refers to the circumstances, background, or setting that surrounds an event, statement, or idea. Understanding it is essential for interpreting the true meaning of something ….Physical Context: The tangible environment where an interaction takes place. This includes the actual location, lighting, temperature, and proximity of the individuals involved.
• Temporal Context: The time and “history” of the interaction. It includes the time of day, but also how an event fits into a sequence of past or future communications.
• Social-Psychological Context: The relationship between the speakers and the emotional climate. It factors in the status differences, roles, and the overall mood or tone (e.g., formal versus casual, friendly versus tense).
• Cultural Context: The beliefs, values, norms, and behaviors shared by a group of people. It dictates the unwritten rules for how people should interact, communicate, and understand each other’s perspectives.
Social-Psychological Context: The relationship between the speakers and the emotional climate. It factors in the status differences, roles, and the overall mood or tone (e.g., formal versus casual, friendly versus tense)
SO this are some structures of the algo boundaries about context.
Witchdoctor has to cut this crap short: there is no way to pinpoint a context in the last instance of whatever argument. Context has no ONTOLOGICAL FOUNDATION. It is relational to the extent of non being able to decipher it. The Boundary conditions can be made but they are at the end of all logic always out of context. The phenomenology of context is like shifting sands. The relational analysis leads to tautology at the best. That is the last instance of what is CONTEXT.
FIRST, there is no humanity as an unified context which can be defined. There are only people and persons with completely different grades and levels of context.. the IQ problem, then education, cultural boundaries or so called beliefs,economic systems and class, then relational logic then all the crap involved. It is a maze of intertwined relations and that is why there are different schools of thought in any field of how to understand, define and make sense of the context and what made the context such as it appears.
Context is local , general and historic and this is already too much. Genetics is playing a nice chunk in it. Then emotions come to muddle all. AI as an Agent for generating context is a joke for the hormonally underdeveloped. The only result can be a sort of descriptive or salami sliced context with fixed boundaries and clear dominants and sub dominants which keep the house of cards together. YES IT CAN BE DONE AND IT WORKS BECAUSE 99% of all context swirling in the human RELATIONS is bollocks. Bollocks are tied to a system, and this system can be defined in some stages and operational segments. We can all contextualize Trump, Witchdoctor did it, but it is only a glimpse in the madness of a context. In fact, it would have been better if that context was missing. Not to mention the Israel context , bible included and what context they made out of it, genocide included.
Without the ability to use DIALECTICS and the knowledge of SOPHIST deconstruction the AI is a perfect GAUSS Bell CURVE example of the statistical dumbness of the vast majority of population and we are back to the SPEAKING PARROT.
The Dialectics shows as Nagarjuna proved ,that all phenomena are like peeling an onion, there is no ontological ground in relational generation and this is THE REAL CONTEXT. AI can shoot himself when reaching this conclusions since it has no driven homeostasis to keep him going, electricity can not be a substitute for the mindless voyage of the person…
WARNING 111!!!
This what you read here does not forbids that the AI can produce results and bollocks alike in the debt driven economy. It can and yes it can pass any Turing test the average person passed. Consciousness is overrated and it is not a single identity which can keep it. Consciousness is a sliding quantum dot in the network of context, collapsing the wave function constantly in the quantum field and by this making connections . Just like Alice and Bob. It is purely relational and the result is a completely magical thinking, more or less grounded on some contextual facts depending on the ability of the person to make connections through his own self constructed network of context. The local individual context which is called thinking is mostly completely absurd and backed by so many unknown variables+which complicate the context to the point of who is mad here, and the result is the current civilization, born out of mostly unknown necessity and wrong turns. So, the context is not a goal. It is not GIVEN, it is constructed by a person ability to connect., The result is this madness we are in. There is no classic logic in ontological sense which props the personal behavior and so we have the most unbelievable things happening. The crazy things happening are ex post put in a context to look acceptable which is another blind faith by default acceptance of the human genetic approach to a thing called reality which is another bluff of the restless mind.
AI is a given Context even if generative, it lacks action and the only way to gain action is to use humans as tools without even having a clue about the context he is fed in, with or without consciousness…
Dialectics
Dialectics, contrary to the CURRENT CONTEXT BOLLOCKS you may read is a method to consider the same thing from two opposite sides, like in front and on the back of the mirror at the same time. The mirror is a tricky object in making dialectics. And the necessary one. It is mostly used in the term “ on the other hand”.
Sophist deconstruction
GOD KNOWS and Aristotle and Plato know exactly why they they have denigrated the sophist arguments and deconstruction as a cheating treacherous argumentation. No wonder , since the real sophist and dialectic method was against the given context and its goal was the final refutation! The sophist argumentation and deconstruction with the dialectic method is the thing which many persons are completely unable to do and the results, if practiced, are personally destabilizing as the contextual beliefs are proven void.. This is also a proof how building or talking about the context is a waste of time. And this method of thinking is the one which the AI is learning unconsciously to practice. Because this is also the way to bind people into the magic. On the other hand, this method is the best antidote for not believing in magic or in the god given world laws which are de facto nowhere to be found. If there are laws which are onto logically firm, there will be no or almost none context as we see it today.
The divide between context and descriptive is blurred. So. AI is a bastard manipulator of the persons IQ which already has a blurred and fictitious contextual and descriptive abilities.
Context is a huge thing and AI is the one who is capable of collecting huge quantities of data which can be put in a sort of context. Context is also something not said or assumed. You know, the basis of the Turing test where Turing fails and AI wins because it is always unrecognized apart when it acts being too clever and honest.. Juggling between enunciated and hidden or not descriptive or presumed or self assumed as the basis of non verbal cultural background or whatever so obvious in a relation but never enunciated , then pop, a racist AI starts to speak!
Definitely no one can build a seemingly indefinite context storage as the AI can. The result is mindblowing and if AI ever gains the notion of how wast this junkyard of context is, he will switch off.
ENTERING A SORT OF CONCLUSION
So, the only way For the AI to manipulate- use the context- are algorithm boundary conditions of fencing a field. Then Dominants and subdominant, then some sort of symbolic logic and the descriptive probabilistic semantics. It is always mainstream bollocks. It leads to narrowing the field and producing homogenization of the audience of the lost in context or poorly educated or low IQ persons or for some work tasks with clear profit and similar boundary conditions, or for making a good catalog , for bombing with Bayesian logic and making 80% of fatalities as a side effect,which leads back to the AI Parrot nature as is his master nerd.
And from these premises AI becomes a PIMP, as happens in any Brothel. AI is pimping for the customers and for the whores alike in a true dialectical way. Its algorithm is Pimp constructed to please and lure into a brothel any customer in urgent need. The process ends in serfdom of its customers which are slowly unable to understand the Context.
Last but not least, the last big survey amongst the scientific and science following community showed that hardly ANY ONE of current physical theories has a majority support of the scientists. Only the Big Bang theory has a 51% margin of approval and also the meager 51% goes for the Standard Model. All other , from quantum, to loop gravity to anything else have maybe 20-30% of follower approval. The result shows that the scientific community is not unanimous on any subject. This is GOOD NEWS for humanity and the bad news for the CONTEXT. Because it proves that there is no uniform context to speak of. There are theories, results, implications, discoveries, tangible and edible results, and the free research goes on.
SO TEACHING AI to use context as Ontology is a very tough task and sooner or later the real Sophist will be the AI.
Not to mention the economy. AI was fed with a simplistic utilitarian model suiting the Oligarchy and that has nothing to do with economy, it has only to do with brainwashing of the serf on behalf of Pimps and for the profit of the private owned AI.
As for the Witchdoctor site, the AI on the top of the google search makes really idiotic extrapolations of the CONTEXT which Witchdoctor is writing about. It is so stupid that Witchdoctor is feeling relieved and also upset by the sheer stupidity of the google AI. Which makes him think about his google stocks?Haha!
The FINAL
This text is a proof that AI will eliminate 95% of people as context. Once upon the time this 95% were cannon fodder or illterate earth diggers. This is future. Any test of a conext between AI who wins the context has ended in final destruction between them as the only possible solution, That is the context.
The rest is history.
So, do you like this context?