Yes it is Le Carre book. Read Le Carre.
It is pretext for a Quantum phenomenology and ontological epistemology, the hypothesis is coming below.
Intro
Some days ago Witchlady and Witchdoctor were rearranging the library. Witchlady came to Wd with a few handwritten pages from a small notebook lost in the sea of stuff. They were a sketch of Witchdoctor preparatory note for his uni diploma on epistemology, a diploma he never finished due to many political/ personal/ life changing reasons. Reading them was fun and WD was laughing at himself on this sophistic twist he wanted to make as his diploma subject, attempting to deconstruct and dismantle anything goes or stands as facts. Maybe it was the fortunate twist that he did not finish such a task, because the naive sophism was good enough to make him not employable for life, which in fact he never attempted to do.
It was another age. But, finding this by chance was proof that something called chance is something we do not understand as pattern or the Mighty Software was having a glitch or whatever?
INFRA
The few pages plot was: if an observer was moving from one tree to another as two points in space/time and if the two trees were completely identical he could never prove to be moving!
In fact, only the 2nd law and entropy could/may prove that there is a timeline of this action. Movement needs a third factor which is observing/involved that there is a process going on, etc, etc and we are always in phase that the process needs some other phenomena to be proved as such and this is a famous endless regress into infinitum and ergo any conclusion fails the proof. Any fact needs some other fact to be real and linked to each other and this chains never ends, Wittgenstein docet . The flip of this coin is the conditioned generation/ arising, or dependent generation, originally a Buddhist invention of great importance, lacking in the brain dead west thought…
So, a movement from A to B can be coherent as A and B include difference., A is different from B. Movement form A to A is a non identifying process since it happens in complete uniformity or uncertainty. Any proof of the movement BETWEEN INDISTINGUISHABLE PHENOMENA needs a third party to decide the process- The Observer, which is the agent out of the process. That is where the idiotic conundrum in QM arises as the Agent – the third party- by its sheer presence collapses the wave function. But if the observer moves between two indistinguishable phenomena, he has no proof to be moving.
AND HERE WE ARE, IN QUANTUM MECHANICS!
Indistinguishable (not able to be identified as different or distinct.) – process – difference– identity- proof of action- role modeling.
This lines tell all in this theoretical Phenomenology and Ontology of QM and other stuff.
So, Difference is the concept which defines TIME and this happens “backwards” moving from – to (somewhere), which then simultaneously also establishes the space- place..
The Quantum Agent, in establishing the process, has to define that the two phenomena- two trees or A and A- are equal only if he knows something third- another tree or B- which is different.
Only by fallacious (false) generalization, which ALWAYS HAPPENS, the generalization of this process is called “movement between two points”!
So, lets go deeper.
Until we have an electron, which is Indistinguishable In QM sense, we have the superposition, entanglement and the whole paraphernalia. So, it all pertains to the identical, indistinguishable “particle” identical to himself. This is how all this stuff can be easily explained. Since we can not peek into indistinguishable which is the place of superposition and entanglement, in a due process with some tricks, we do it after.
Alice and Bob come AFTER. The Difference is what makes Alice and Bob come to “life”- when they “gain” or achieve the Different spin/angular momentum! Regardless where this spin comes from ( De Pauli or Bohm/ Broglie concepts) , they come alive only by difference, i.e. by gaining or by having gained a difference or whatever eigenvalus one likes in the process of IDENTIFICATION! And we finally have some action!
All things happening after these is in the realm of ROLE MODELING.
Folks this sounds like human being, born indistinguishable, sees the difference, creates by this the space/time , hops onto some identity, and goes into role modeling which is always made by the parents, friends strangers, state, police and sex. And gets under the tracks of some influence ( quantum or otherwise), becomes an Influencer and starts Peddling the bollocks for money.
The same semantic, same Phenomenology and same Ontology. No wonder Witchdoctor never made the academic life. They- the academia and the bored students would have been pissed of, so he pissed off in time. Fortunately he concluded that socialist/ communist system or a neoliberal fascist one does not accepts these types and definitely he did not want to be a court buffoon.
That is why this blog is a finger, you know which, raised high to the sky.
THE ELECTRON IN QM
“I received a telephone call one day at the graduate college at Princeton from Professor Wheeler, in which he said, “Feynman, I know why all electrons have the same charge and the same mass” “Why?” “Because, they are all the same electron!”[1] “ – Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-electron_universe
Now hm haha, Witchdoctor is not proposing this solution . In fact, the Witchdoctor solution is epistemological philosphical one and does not at the moment wants to count how many electrons are out there.
Even the Feynman idea of positron as mirroring phenomena is already in the realm of identity through difference.
The hypothesis of the ground Phenomenology and Ontology proposed here by Witchdoctoir who got from Witchlady his own lost fragment floating through time is that
the identical indistinguishable – lets call it an electron – even if its mass and charge are known, can not be measured in any behaviour process, action difference, before the whole process starts – Indistinguishable (not able to be identified as different or distinct. ) – process – difference– identity- proof of action- role modelling.
So, QM is not a problem of measurement, because the origin can not be identified since is identical to itself, until the process differentiation starts.
Even causality or non causality is established through difference!
At least this is what my – Witchdoctor- fragment says.
The rest is special ansd standard relativity catalogue.
Once a Sophist, always a Sophist!
Yours QM Agent running in the Field
copyright by Witchdoctor