Hi there. It is not me, Witchdoctor, who did it, It is Witchlady.
It happened after an excellent lunch and some red wine . Witchlady was a chef cook. And after an excellent coffee.
The conversation was about the absolute impossibility to distinguish the participants involved in a Turing test. No way, by any means, to spot on the both sides of the curtain who is the Artificial Intelligence participant. They are all too stupid to conclude anything more than the “man made bollocks” and so, the bollocks concern all, AI included, since it is Man Made . So, they all pass the Turing test.
There are tons and thousands of well paid experts, Math, logic philosophy semantic bollocks who still debate and pollute the environment on this subject.
Here is the previous link on the subject:
https://www.witchdoctor.space/2019/10/12/from-turing-test-to-witchdoctor-test/
from this link follow the other links there…
Witchlady has solved it.
This questions make AI always fail the Turing Test. It is not a minor issue, you will see it, eventually, in time..
The spotting of the AI needs just some questions:
“ Do you eat?”
“Do you drink?”
“ Do you piss?”
“Do you shit?”
Now, dear reader, this is vulgar, is it not? Why not ask AI if he “goes to the rest room”, “mens room” , “laddies room”or “toilet”?
Simple, AI might go to the “rest room” but it does not mean he is going to produce the proof of the poop ding.AI may go and come to and fro the “toilet” and that is all but where is the urine part proof of going to the rest room? He can answer yes, but it is not yes because AI went to piss…
Now, the AI could lie answering this questions. But here we have no liar paradox or any semantic logic or whatever to to speak of, since these methods never spot who is a bigger idiot, the human or the AI..
We Fact Check.
Does he eats and drinks and after when we offer some nice drinks,we go with him to the rest room and sit near and listen.
The proof of the poopding, after the pudding dropped down .
In next 273 years, Philip K. Dick permitting, we should ask the Android humanoid dreaming of the electric sheeple:
“ Do you really need to eat, really need to drink and really need to piss or shit or it is just a fake act? An act to make us think you need to do it?”
So, the Turing test is closed, for ever.In the closet.
As the test is closed, let concentrate on the Quantum computer qubits.
42, 54 , 72 or 74 qubits, which make a good AI?
Dear Hitchikers through the galaxy , have you a towel ready? Witchdoctor was researching hard what Douglas Adams meant with the 42 being the Universe number.
There is one good explanation: in the movie Hollywood party, Peter Sellers is a small actor and he is repeating the scene of the battle on the Kyber Pass endlessly and even has a nice watch on his wrist while doing it. Watch is showing the Time which is from another century and not existing at the time of the battle at the Kyber Pass.
After hours of disastrous, repeating scene takes, fantastic acting by Peter Sellers,
the Movie Director says;” Lets have a 42! “
Thats it – Douglas Adams was there, and so was George Kilroy!
We have the 42!
A+ Disastrous, repeating and with the wrong Time and wrong objects which are not fitting in the Time Period! The Universe.
The 54 is the number of the Google Quantum computer. 53 to be precise, since the 54th qubit died in the act.
But, in Witchdoctor humble opinion, the 54 qubits are a wrong set for a good Quantum computing.
It is the 72 qubits which stack more nicely, having 1,2,3, 6, 4, 8, 9,12 24…36, and much more
That is the layering needed.
72 is the compound interest computing number tool and is very near the real number.
What about the 73th qubit?
Hmm, it is a must prime number.it is all about quantum normalization which is needed. And for decoherence.
Hmm, maybe yes.sounds good.or not? It sounds Bohmian…and WD is a fan of the pilot trash wave….
But one thing is certain. Witchlady has given the One and the Only proof of the Turing test and the final failure of the AI to pass it.
Witchdoctor